Quote:
Originally Posted by DC_DEEP  Well, ya see, this is the thing...
If they want to be offended, that's their business. I don't really care. They do a lot of stuff that I think is offensive.
But the big difference is, they want to dictate how I live my life and what I do with consenting adults in the privacy of my own home. I don't really give a flying fuck what they believe or do, as long as they leave me out of it. They claim I infringe upon their rights by holding differing beliefs; they claim I infringe on their rights if I say they can't make my life decisions for me.
Anyone see the difference here? |
You have really hit the nail on the head.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCbear ...
No, seriously, that's exactly it, DC. This bullshit about how opening up the definition of marriage to include same-gender couples "destroys" the "sanctity" of marriage is just laughable. Or it would be, if they weren't OMFG serious.
I think it's time to make divorces much more difficult to obtain. |
Clearly the fastest way to defend the sanctity of marriage would be to outlaw divorce except in extreme circumstances (like abuse). I mean, I wasn't under the impression that gay people marrying would somehow destroy the marriages of straight people. I missed that causal relationship.