Thread: What does "Non-Homophobic" mean?
View Single Post
Old 05-15-2008   #15 (permalink)
njqt466
njqt466 is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by STD View Post
They already do....LOL Why is that so more acceptable? We and they have fun with them having fun, but if we (the guys) did likewise it would be nowhere near as acceptabe - let alone erotic to them.
Then you shouldn't do it, just keep the fantasy alive online if you must.

[quote=STD;1482297]Does it mean "curious". The reason I ask is that I'm married and we have been having sex with another married couple (guess that makes us "swingers"). It was good that neither of us were homophobic and had no problems when we touched (even intimately) each other whilst having sex with the girls.

Quote:
Now we've progressed to me and him considering having a "one-off" playtime with each other - without the girls. Just me and him stroking and maybe sucking each other (but who knows what else might happen - lol).
I don't see a problem with you two experimenting. Doing it with out the knowledge and permission of both wives is a big issue. I am not saying that because you are both men. If you decided to hook up with his wife and not tell your respective spouses I would still feel the same way. It's the secrecy part that does not bode well in this situation.

Quote:
Is "non-homophobic" another way of saying "Ask me. I just might"
No, it is not.

Quote:
I see where you're coming form, but the word "trisexular" doesn't come up in everyday converstion.
Quote:
Gay, straight, bi-curious and homophobic do come up in everyday conversation.
True, and trisexular sounds slutty, not experimental.

Maybe we need another word for "trisexular" cuz it seems to fit the bill, but it's not very user-friendly.

Quote:
Maybe "Homotol" (homesexually tollerant) or something similar.
Quote:
Tri-sexual sounds a bit pervie, to me.
Homotol is too close to troll. You could try the up and coming "pansexual." I'm not fond of it, because no one seems able to decide on one finite definition for it.