Quote:
Originally Posted by bearsnotcubs  i'm not ashamed to admit... a machine would probably get her off more and better than i could. heh |
Welcome to the LPSG! Please read more than just the thread titles. kevbo said half an hour ago that he never meant to make it a competition between men and toys, (he said it a few days ago too). The question is really asking what exactly the difference is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevbo Thanks for understanding what I was asking and getting the thread back on track.  |
No worries!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevbo And this is exactly what I was expecting to hear from somebody -- thanks so much (again) for understanding what I was asking and directly describing what the differences are. And you also make the good point that this doesn't exclude men from the equation -- we are not being mechanically cuckolded  . It's merely a matter of improved technology in one facet of sexual activity. |
I think that is a real fear for many men: mechanical cuckolding. I remember the first time I demonstrated a rabbit for my current boyfriend. He said, "Wow. Men are obsolete!" He was also worried that if my vagina could break them, it could hurt his penis. That's not the case, by the way. The contractions that destroy toys do so because I force the toys (with my hands) to resist the contractions. A penis just gets forced out painlessly and has to be re-inserted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevbo It's interesting how careful one has to be sometimes with the smallest of phrases. By putting "vs." in the title, I may have made this look more adversarial than intended. I was going for brevity... 
Cheers,
Kevbo |
It's hard to communicate when text is the sole medium.