Oh really? Would nature (or nature's God creator) agree? A human womb is technically, actually a baby incubator. It's purpose isn't merely maintaining the already "huge" size of the human race, but ENLARGING the human race further.

For most all of history, most normal people didn't practice much of any "family planning." Babies came to life when they came, and were generally fairly welcome to be born. Even the demographic terms bear witness to the respecting of the natural flow of human life. "Natural increase," and people having "issue" of children. As if God was "issuing" out the babies, to lots of families who could maybe find some place for more children, many of which families already had several children.

I don't at all agree with the anti-humanity bent of the "family planning" pushers. In the bewildering array of anti-life, anti-nature "birth control" "options," I would like to see the many virtues of the "no method" method, help put it at the very top of the list of "family planning" methods.

I have long advocated that it's okay, and natural, to allow the womb, especially among those few people who might find themselves to be very fertile, to be a rather "busy" place. And while the human womb can stretch to hold many babies at the same time, it even better can naturally push out sometimes rather large families, at just 1 baby at a time, sometimes having a couple sets of twins, in the most newsworther sensationally large families. That's hardly a "clown car" packed to "overflowing" with jammed-in clowns.