Greek you are obviously a North American. People around the world don't make fun of the natural male. I sympathize with you some - naturally normal in a circumcising culture. But not much. Most non-intact guys have never seen an intact penis up close and personal. (Most guys are straight and most guys of the age of sexual maturity in the U.S. are cut.) You on the other hand ought to know better.

There's a picture of the ridged band on Foreskin :: Prepuce :: Ridged Band - donno how it could be an invention. You say you have a ridged band, so I guess it's real? Just because no one has described something before doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It just means someone is actually doing some research on the penis, instead of cutting bits of it off and saying it has no effect at all. It's still just as big, just as sensitive and just as functional as before

What is comical is how whatever you say is just the plain ol' facts, while intactivists have to prove that normal is normal. Some things are self-evident and normal is one of them.

If you'd rather not have your whole penis, you can go and get it selectively amputated however you want - assuming the doctor will do what you tell him to - they kind of do a one-size-fits-all job. Maybe they do a better job on adults, since there's more there to work with. Of course, according to this researcher, "...nerves regenerating after surgery seldom, if ever, cross the scar, as it is an impenetrable barrier to the delicate growth cones sprouting from the proximal nerve stump...":

The Frenular Delta

Since your natural parts are so insensitive to begin with, you better get a circumcision quick since The key word here is "recently." I'm linking to my sources. Where do you get your crap anyway?