Quote:
Originally Posted by jason_els  I would be likely angered by somebody taking a picture of my sisters or mother knowing they would use that picture for erotic stimulation. Doesn't make it illegal though and, frankly, all three women can take care of themselves well enough. I doubt any of them would be truly bothered by it.
People are constantly photographed all the time both openly and secretly, and we don't know what the people on the other end of that camera intend. The price of going out into public is the loss of some privacies and it has been that way since forever. Just can't let it get to you. |
arsonists don't get to me but i'd love them to stop setting buildings on fire. i seriously think you guys are playing a prank on me. is it going to kill you to have your genitilia photographed in public?? no. i think what's happening here is people who are more liberal are assuming that everyone is okay with being photographed. should people who don't want their groins and busts photographed stay in the house?? they can't live their life because SOMEBODY ELSE wants to take pictures of them?? what kind of freedom is that?? if freedom is obsolete, which is more important, free sexuality or freedom of not wanting to be photographed candidly and without your knowledge. i see you guys are going to run me in circles on this one so moving forward
-how many of you wouldn't care if your child comes home and says that they were touched while they were sleep when staying at a friend's house??