Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamer20  *Obscene as in a "loathsome" act by the photographer but the photo would not be pornography. Photos of nipple slips, penis slips, crotch bulges, even public nudity do not equate to pornography.  Digitally edited tribal documentaries??? |
What he said.
The act of the photographer is rude, but the work itself is not necessarily obscene.
If someone gets off on the Statue of Liberty does that make the Statue of Liberty pornographic? How about the Venus de Milo? Her boobs are out in the open for anyone to see. Howabout this
sleeping hermaphrodite? He/She has an erection. I wager at some point in the last 2000 years some guy's cranked out a load looking at it.