My God, what a loaded question just begging for an argument!
They are both so much alike, yes, *true* experience-wise included. The huge difference is one continually denies mistakes made in favor of excuses, shows the same old bickering and has miserable management skills evidenced by how the campaign is run right now.

The other is not afraid to tell the truth even if it means loosing votes; looks at the bigger, more important, picture; has vision that has brought in huge numbers of previously disgruntled voters as well as encouraged young people to participate in a process that many had given up on.

Come on, who do you want managing the government? I vote for someone who has demonstrated and continues to demonstrate that they know how to manage people and money without givng in to emotional outbursts just because they can't have their way even after they try to change the rules because they are loosing. Get a clue!

Now, had your question been "If your democratic candidate is not the party's nominee, will you cross over and vote for the other party's candidate or not vote?" would have been a bit less partial to your own preference and indicate that you really wanted to know instead of bumping an agenda (actually including a poll when it was labeled as such might have helped too).

Thank you Industrial size for posting the facts.