Quote:
Originally Posted by marleyisalegend  okay don't let my bad example misconstrue my point. i guess this is a case of indivdual rights overlapping one another. you're certainly free to take a picture of a woman's boobs in public but, though that doesn't infringe on any specific right of hers, doesn't it atleast cause an issue with morality? IMO looking is a stretch because it can called human nature, but whats natural about taking a picture and posting on a website called candidpics or something of that nature?? do morals only come into play when there's a window in between the photographer and the subject. because the instant the woman steps into her home, the photographer is a peeping tom. how is something NOT acceptable inside a building, but completely acceptable outside of one?? |
In your home you have an expectation of privacy. Out in public you should have no such expectations. Of all of the millions of people in America, you got one guy doing shameful but not illegal things. This is not a huge issue that needs some kind of recourse.
That said, if a picture of me is taken in public is used on a web page in a harmful way, I do have the right to sue for damages because I am not a public figure. But damages have to be proven. I doubt if a court is interested in me whining because someone showed a picture of my bulge. BIG DEAL. How many people see my bulge on the street every day anyway?
Marley, why do you even have issues with this stuff? And why do you think this is a gay issue? You should have figured out by now from reading the threads on this site that as many straight guys look at bulges and guys dicks in the locker room etc as gay guys. I find it pretty offensive to call this thread "gay perverts".