Quote:
Originally Posted by marleyisalegend you're obviously ignoring the damage inflicted upon victims of sexual abuse. is oogling a guy in the gym gonna hurt him? no. is it okay to take a picture of his crotch and post it on the web when he doesn't know about it?? if that's okay then kindly let me know when your mother will be leaving for work. you must admit that, at a certain point, a line of morality is crossed. if sex were 100% free there'd be 45 year old men having sex with 12 year old girls who aren't yet capable of understanding the dynamics of a sexual relationship and will ultimately be left damaged and rejected when the man returns home to his wife. the fact that you justify it by "lack of control" is quite frightening. i'll never control murder so does that mean i should ignore murder too?? the problem is you're under the assumption that sex is some beautiful, wonderful thing that only happens between two consentual people. often times it is, many times it's not. there's a reason we have laws about sex, imagine the damage done if every person is given free reign to indulge in their sexual fantasies and fetishes. |
Who has been sexually abused? It appears that a vast number of his subjects didn't even know he was taking pictures. I'm sure they don't feel traumatized for life.
If you do not want people to look at your crotch in public then cover it.
How are you equating the sexual abuse of a child to having some person taking pictures of
clothed crotches?
This man did not sexually abuse anyone and to equate what he did with child abuse is hysterical.