Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveHd  To default6789:
Scars can change over time -- lighter or darker -- so it's nothing to be concerned about. To: cirus:
My guess is that the two "piercings" are skin bridges. They are an indirect result of infant circumcision but that doesn't mean the circ. was flawed. They form during the post-operative period and are more common for a "loose" cut as opposed to a "tight" cut. Sometimes the remnant foreskin and glans will form an adhesion. In the post-operative period, parents are sometimes advised to put Vaseline on the glans as a prophylaxis against skin adhesions. Maybe that wasn't done?
They are uncommon but not particularly rare.
As previously mentioned, more surgery [more cutting] is the proscribed remedy.
More info with some pics: Botch Gallery 1 - skin bridges -- reader advisory: Pics in preceding link are disturbing some. |
I have never seen an uncircumcised penis that I thought looked horrible but I have seen a lot of train wreck circumcisions.
It really scared me when I saw what would have happened to my son if I had not kept insisting that his penis did not look normal.
The doctor finally pulled his skin back which had attached from his circumcision.
The doctors here are so stupid. They don't think it matters if someones sex organs are damaged.
It's like we should feel lucky to have them at all. Now doctors are trying to get women to have their labia removed to look pre-puberty .