Quote:
Originally Posted by senor rubirosa  I don't ever like this argument.
If every American or Canadian or British domestic problem had to be solved before the U.S., Canada or Britain could validly help people in other countries, then the rich countries would never be helping the poor ones.
Because there would always be unmet domestic problems.
Rich countries should give to poor countries just as rich individuals should give to their poorer brethern. |
No I agree... there's always priorities, and you will... never in a
free nation of 350M+ ppl be able to educate, medicate, and employ everybody.
In economics, it's like the
efficient frontier but swap "spending" for "risk", which I won't go into, because I know which LPSGers get it, and rest are a bunch o' horny lunkheads (that's a good thing for some of you)... a la diminishing returns.