04-08-2008
|
#10 (permalink)
|
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddie53 Hazel, I'm surprised at you. I was sure you would do a dissertation on why the author of this editorial has drawn different for sure and possibly incorrect conclusions from the evidence available.
I really was expecting a point by point analysis of the two articles by you. |
Nope, not interested in such mental masturbation. They're playing a game of numbers, as though the candidates were equal in all respects. That premise is false, so nothing built atop it interests me. The fact is, I believe HRC to be a despicable and untrustworthy human being unfit for any public office, least of all the Presidency of the United States. Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddie53 But then that is the critical difference between you and me Hazel. I will vote for the Democratic nominee regardless who he/she is come November. From what you have written in the past I have concluded that should Clinton be the nominee, you would not vote for her. | Not much of a reach, considering that I've explicitly stated on multiple occasions that (a) I'm not a party loyalist of any sort, and (b) I most certainly would not vote for HRC come hell or high water. |
| |
|
| |