Flashy, you're arguing that someone's actions determine who they are. I'm say that someone's actions are motivated by their desires. This is Aristotle speaking of how drama can reflect reality 2,500 years ago. In the example I posted, those models' desires were, I'm guessing, for money and maybe possibly out of curiosity of what it means to be homosexual, since they have not experienced it. The desire was not to physically get off with another man, as you could plainly see by their difficulty to maintain arousal. Now you could argue that they were repressing their homosexual/bisexual desires, but that can't be proven. Unless you wanna call them up...

It also seems like you have "faith" in a certain definition of what sexuality means, and I can't convince you that it's anything otherwise. It would also be inappropriate for the thread, unless everyone else is cool with this turning into a debate on sexuality.