LPSG.ORG

How Big is BIG ??

notAlittleBoy: over13inches, your formula give me a 0.954 but i don't know if that's good or bad.

is part of a discussion in the Sex With a Large Penis forum that includes topics on Real-life experiences, techniques, pros and cons, injuries, masturbation, etc..

Go Back   LPSG.ORG > Sex With a Large Penis

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-01-2003   #31 (permalink)
Guest is offline

notAlittleBoy: over13inches,

your formula give me a 0.954 but i don't know if that's good or bad.
 
Old 02-02-2003   #32 (permalink)
Guest is offline

over13inches: 0.746 is around the average value to expect
Mine gives me 1.863 but that's expected I guess

O13
 
Old 02-02-2003   #33 (permalink)
Guest is offline

riddick81: Dear 013,
I don't believe that height and weight have anything to do with genital size. during my 81 years I have had a chance to observe many nude males at the gym and showers. I have sited many man very tall and heavy that have a small penis and conversely there seems to be many short and slin men who hung like horses! So how does this fit with you equation???????? Frank at CMDFrank@msn.com
 
Old 02-02-2003   #34 (permalink)
jonb is offline

10.5*[(2*3.14*sqrt<7/3.14>)] /75
10.5*2*3.14*sqrt<7/3.14>/75
10.5*2*3.14*sqrt<2.23>/75
10.5*2*3.14*1.49/75
31*3.14*1.49/75
97.3*1.49/75
145/75
1.9333
 
Old 02-03-2003   #35 (permalink)
Guest is offline

markw: Interesting equation, I come out at 1.16.

Trouble is, it is difficult to relate the resulting number to 'how big is big'... Is, say, 1.5 truly enormous or just impressive?, etc...
 
Old 02-03-2003   #36 (permalink)
Guest is offline

7x6andchg: So if the average man (US) is 70 inches tall, aka 5'10" or 177.8 cm for our metric brethren, and has a 5.4 inch long and 4.5 inch around penis (per the circulated Durex study that actually used nurses to measure instead of relying on self-measurement)...I come up with a .58 ratio using the equation provided by O13.

Myself, at 5'8" and 7.25x6.25 I get .94.

Now....if there is a statistics major in this group somewhere, perhaps...we can get a standard deviation or two on each side and figure out what constitutes "big" "bigger" "huge" and "off the charts" - say at a 99% confidence interval?

<sound of a non-statistics major throwing down a gauntlet to whomever wants to pick up the challenge - there has to be a stats major out there somewhere> :D
 
Old 02-08-2003   #37 (permalink)
Guest is offline

brent9by6: My value came out as 1.01

6' tall with 8.75"
 
Old 02-08-2003   #38 (permalink)
jonb is offline

Unfortunately, we need a more balanced survey sample to come up with a SD.

Here's a site to calculate variance and SD:

http://www.davidmlane.com/hyperstat/A16252.html
 
Old 02-08-2003   #39 (permalink)
Guest is offline

7x6andchg: I knew someone with more of a stats background would come out of the "wood"work! :D
 
Old 02-08-2003   #40 (permalink)
DeeBlackthorne is offline

1.23, with all digits rounded to two decimal places.
 
Old 02-15-2003   #41 (permalink)
Guest is offline

HotCock007: Why did I start all this madness!!!!!
 
Old 02-15-2003   #42 (permalink)
Guest is offline

aussiechick63: Because you just couldn't help yourself, could you.
Just teasing you. :D
 
Old 02-18-2003   #43 (permalink)
Guest is offline

HotCock007: Thanks Aussie! Glad someone understands the madness to my methods! :D
 
Old 02-18-2003   #44 (permalink)
Max
Max is offline

1.34 here.

Hey JonB, you didn't multiply your 10.5 by 2 and make it 31 did you, by any chance ... ?

I couldn't work out why my reading was so much less impressive than yours ... especially since I am only 5 10.
 
Old 02-18-2003   #45 (permalink)
Guest is offline

suzyq: My b/f is about 9" and that is huge to me :) I can't imagine anything bigger :o
 

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 AM.

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs


Copyright 1999-2008 LPSG.ORG

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7