LPSG.ORG

your fantasy?

HUMONGOUS: thank you tiger for your support. you would think they would concern themselves with something more relevant than a fantasy. i would think that DMW would be spending his time "keeping on the watch

is part of a discussion in the New Member Introductions forum that includes topics on Introduce yourself, everyone here was once new to the LPSG!.


Go Back   LPSG.ORG > New Member Introductions

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-20-2003   #16 (permalink)
Guest is offline

HUMONGOUS: thank you tiger for your support. you would think they would concern themselves with something more relevant than a fantasy. i would think that DMW would be spending his time "keeping on the watch for the next hurricane" or being better prepared for the next one to hit his area, as oppossed to be overly concernd wih a school-boy fantasy. :D ;D :P :-[
 
Old 11-20-2003   #17 (permalink)
Guest is offline

tigerwolf: Its like another topic on the board that's been annoying me, with Britney Spears calling her ex boyfriend tiny. Who fucking cares? So he has a tiny dick. Then the drama queens on this board go off bitching about what a bitch and a slut she is etc.

Personally? If she's was not pleased with his size, and that was one of the deciding factors in her getting rid of him, all the power to her, at least she's going for what she wants. I'm no fan of hers myself, but she's got the right to say what she wants, and its called freedom of speech.

Just like on here, freedom of thought. And its the same drama queens trying to say that you're stalking this person etc, because you have a fantasy about sleeping with them. Almost as if these people have never once fucking fantasized about being with someone else, or taken a picture {THAT WAS POSTED ONLINE mind you.. } and hung it on their wall. I mean seriously, don't you people have more important things to do with your lives than critisize this person for having a fantasy? Jesus Christ.. I'm sure there's plenty of other problems in your life that could use some tending to.
 
Old 11-20-2003   #18 (permalink)
DoubleMeatWhopper is offline
Banned

I am not 'overly concernd' (sic) with the situation. I never entertained the thought that your 'crush' was on me; you said the moderator is straight, and I am not. Both Gigz and I know who your 'fantasy moderator studmuffin' is. I did not accuse you of cyberstalking him, but c'mon:
Quote:
i have fantasized about this moderator to the extent that I have a picture of him on my wall that I printed after seeing a photograph of him on hs website. the fantasies have kept me going...
Does this really not sound the least bit obsessive to you? Am I the only one who gets mental flashes of John Hinckley, Jr., whacking off over photos of Jodie Foster when reading the quotation above? You might not be cyber-stalking Dee, but you're getting awfully creepy in your admissions.

And thank you for your concern, but I really have no need to keep an eye out for hurricanes. I'm currently not in their path.
 
Old 11-20-2003   #19 (permalink)
Guest is offline

norseman: Is it my imagination or is there a higher level of anger and righeous indignation on the board lately ? *For a support group there seems to be a lot of "need to be right", "need to get the last word in", or "need to antagonize" going on. *Anyone else noticed this ?

Just curious. *It's getting a little hot in here. *Think I'll leave and go out to catch a breath of fresh air now.
 
Old 11-20-2003   #20 (permalink)
Guest is offline

Tender: it must be your imagination...

i dont think if i were said Moderator that i would be happy myself.
seems like the next step would be to ask him to send a pair of used underwear?
kinda creepy lol.
i agree with DMW...
could have shared fantasy without putting someones identity here not having their permission.
and yes Mod, straight, and website, IS identifying info.
everyone knows who it is.
*I* would be uncomfortable with that.
the dictionary i have defines voyeurism as a prying observer who is usually seeking the sordid or the scandalous...
not a far cry you know... and isnt that bordering on stalking? or ilegal? or at least morally distasteful.
Tender
 
Old 11-20-2003   #21 (permalink)
Guest is offline

tigerwolf: Ugh. I didn't want it to go here, but its going to obviously.

There is NOTHING, NOT ONE THING illegal about fantasizing. Is he following Dee around in real life and trying to get him to have sex with him? No. What is he doing? He's printed out a publically accessable picture online and hung it on his wall, and he entertains himself with the idea of sex. Its a fantasy! Get it through your head people and quit trying to make this into a big fucking drama about psycho stalkers and such. This topic is not about what you think of his fantasy, but about sharing fantasies, and you people have done nothing but work to turn this into Humongous sounding like a serial killer psychotic waiting to happen. Grow up, for christ's sake.
 
Old 11-20-2003   #22 (permalink)
Guest is offline

Andrea: Oh my goodness.
This thread is rather distasteful in all respects.
Wouldn't it be best for the moderator to delete the whole thing so we can start again?
The initial idea of posting and reading about fantasies you well endowed men have was rather intriguing after all.


Andrea xxx
 
Old 11-21-2003   #23 (permalink)
Guest is offline

HUMONGOUS: [quote author=DoubleMeatWhopper link=board=meetgreet;num=1035871977;start=0#17 date=11/20/03 at 15:55:50]I am not 'overly concernd' (sic) with the situation. I never entertained the thought that your 'crush' was on me; you said the moderator is straight, and I am not. Both Gigz and I know who your 'fantasy moderator studmuffin' is. I did not accuse you of cyberstalking him, but c'mon:

Does this really not sound the least bit obsessive to you? Am I the only one who gets mental flashes of John Hinckley, Jr., whacking off over photos of Jodie Foster when reading the quotation above? You might not be cyber-stalking Dee, but you're getting awfully creepy in your admissions.

And thank you for your concern, but I really have no need to keep an eye out for hurricanes. I'm currently not in their path. [/quote]
yes, you are the only one who gets mental flashes. your word not mine. you seem to be overly obsessed with this thread concerning my fantasy, and it is an obsession in itself. are you actually comparing this to the Hinckley-Foster situation? does this remind you of that and if so how? i would really like to know, considering what Hinckley did to try and impress Foster. i would suggest that you leave the steroids alone if you feel there is any resemblance. ::) :o :( ;D :P :-[
 
Old 11-21-2003   #24 (permalink)
Guest is offline

HUMONGOUS: [quote author=norseman link=board=meetgreet;num=1035871977;start=0#18 date=11/20/03 at 1613]Is it my imagination or is there a higher level of anger and righeous indignation on the board lately ? *For a support group there seems to be a lot of "need to be right", "need to get the last word in", or "need to antagonize" going on. *Anyone else noticed this ?

Just curious. *It's getting a little hot in here. *Think I'll leave and go out to catch a breath of fresh air now.[/quote]
i agree with you wholeheartedly. i posted my fantasy and now i am being taken to task for doing so. the level of anger suggests that i am being attacked. to insult to injury Tender has weighed in with guidelines for posting fantasies * ;D :D :P ::) ???
 
Old 11-21-2003   #25 (permalink)
Guest is offline

Tender: :D
guidelines eh?

well anyone with even a shred of social grace,
knows one can post all the fantasy he wants, BUT when you put someones NAME in it, without their permission,
its unmannerly at best.
it seems most of the other mindful posters here agree.
thats the thing, fantasy neednt have included a name.
ever think the dream hunk might be uncomfortable with that?
as DMW has so elequently put before--- "plonk"... :D

Tender
 
Old 11-21-2003   #26 (permalink)
Guest is offline

sfsbdgb: I was gonna say, I thought this was a post of Fantasy...not "reality" ... Humongous you sound like a great fantasy ....but if you ever want reality... :D ;)
 
Old 11-21-2003   #27 (permalink)
Guest is offline

tigerwolf: [quote author=Tender link=board=meetgreet;num=1035871977;start=20#24 date=11/21/03 at 0610] :D
guidelines eh?

well anyone with even a shred of social grace,
knows one can post all the fantasy he wants, BUT when you put someones NAME in it, without their permission,
its unmannerly at best.
it seems most of the other mindful posters here agree.
thats the thing, fantasy neednt have included a name.
ever think the dream hunk might be uncomfortable with that?
as DMW has so elequently put before--- "plonk"... :D

Tender [/quote]

Um. He didn't post a name. DMW did.
 
Old 11-21-2003   #28 (permalink)
DoubleMeatWhopper is offline
Banned

[quote author=tigerwolf link=board=meetgreet;num=1035871977;start=20#26 date=11/21/03 at 0638]

Um. He didn't post a name. DMW did.[/quote]

He indicated a straight male moderator with a website that had his picture. That could only be Dee, and any regular reader of the board can figure that out with zero difficulty. Pointing out the object of his affection with such specifics is as good as naming him.
 
Old 11-21-2003   #29 (permalink)
Guest is offline

tracksuitboy: [quote author=tigerwolf link=board=meetgreet;num=1035871977;start=20#26 date=11/21/03 at 0638]
Um. He didn't post a name. DMW did.[/quote]

DMW has already said what I wanted to so I will just agree with him here that Humongous did identify the subject of his fantasy. *H you have been put to task for the identification of the person not for posting a fantasy as others have done. *


[quote author=Tender link=board=meetgreet;num=1035871977;start=20#24 date=11/21/03 at 0610] well anyone with even a shred of social grace,
knows one can post all the fantasy he wants, BUT when you put someones NAME in it, without their permission,
its unmannerly at best.
it seems most of the other mindful posters here agree.
thats the thing, fantasy neednt have included a name.
ever think the dream hunk might be uncomfortable with that?
[/quote]

I wholeheartedly agree with Tender. *The subject of the fantasy may very well be embarrassed and/or feel uneasy with this.

And H, there was nothing wrong with the fantasy in itself!
 
Old 11-21-2003   #30 (permalink)
DoubleMeatWhopper is offline
Banned

For the record, I believe that fantasizing about someone is perfectly normal. And if you want to put that fantasy object's picture on
the wall like you're a teenaged girl moist for Justin Timberlake, fine. That's not what most creeped me out ... it's the phrase, "the fantasies have kept me going," that gave me that Hinckleyesque chill. The fantasy of having sex with Dee gives you the impetus to continue? Does that sound obsessive to anyone else, or is it just me? I can only go by what I read.
 

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Latest Threads
Nose type and size
26 Minutes Ago by nakeddad
Netherlands
34 Minutes Ago by WRXero
Olga :)
40 Minutes Ago by fgeorgio

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs
Morning Shower Flip Video:
51 Minutes Ago by Austin Blue
This Is Life
5 Hours Ago by JasonDawgxxx
Update
13 Hours Ago by 5uccu8u5
And so it begins
15 Hours Ago by Box_Man
The Penis Film 1.
17 Hours Ago by Austin Blue


Copyright 1999-2008 LPSG.ORG

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7