Security vetting is a joke unless you're working for either a governmental organization, which is security-related, or you're applying for a company or organization that has none but the best relations to these organizations, and every stone in your past life will be turned and investigated. Security checks for many other private companies are being done by more or less efficient subcontractors, and so are the results: Sometimes useful, often mediocre, sometimes useless. For my employment with *...*, I needed a SSBI.

That aside, I am not sure whether her poetic take on martyrdom and jihad makes a planned attack, acted out by her, more likely. She appears to me more like a dreamer, less like an actual perpetrator. But she had useful goods for other terrorists: Security clearance, knowledge of the premises, ideologic pervasion. Also, she appears unobtrusive, despite her obvious religiousity, after having worked there for long. A preemptive conviction, if legally backed, would be justified in this case.